Built for the students who find revision hard

Most revision tools are built for the students who were always going to be fine.

You can see it in how they're designed. They reward the kids who already turn up every day, who already enjoy the streaks and the leaderboards, who already know how to revise and just need somewhere to do it. For those students, almost anything works.

Gradora is built for the other ones. The capable student who's quietly decided they're "just not good at this." The one who tries, gets a cross, doesn't know why, and slowly stops trying. The one who needs the help to be specific before they'll believe it's worth their time.

Why I started this

I watched a student I care about lose confidence — not because they couldn't do the work, but because the help they were getting was never specific enough to act on. "Revise this topic." "Look over your mistakes." "Try harder." All true, all useless. None of it told them the one concrete thing to do differently next time.

What they needed was simple to say and hard to find: show me exactly which marks I missed, and exactly how to get them next time. Not a grade. Not encouragement-by-default. The specific step.

When the help finally got that specific — naming the method, pointing at the exact mark-scheme point, showing the worked step — something changed. The work stopped feeling like a verdict on whether they were "clever," and started feeling like a list of fixable things. That's the whole idea Gradora is built on.

What "built for them" actually means

It's easy to say "for everyone." It's harder to design for the student who finds it hard, because it changes real decisions:

• Name the method on every question. Not just the answer — the approach. A student who doesn't know how to start can't learn from a worked solution that assumes they already did.
• Make the help specific, not cheerful. No "great effort!" on a 1-out-of-8 answer. That's not kindness; it's a missed chance to tell them the one thing that would help. Honest and specific is more respectful than vague and warm.
• No shame, no surveillance, no streak-guilt. Missing a day is part of being a teenager with a life. Nothing in Gradora is designed to make a student feel they're falling behind or being watched. The work is theirs.
• Ground everything in the real mark scheme. So the feedback is verifiable, not vibes. A student can check that the mark they were told they missed is really there.

Honest about what we are

We try to be straight about the product, too. Some things Gradora makes fresh for each student; some things we make once, carefully, and check against the official mark scheme so the quality is the same every time. We'd rather tell you which is which than pretend everything is magic.

And we don't promise grades. We can't honestly know what any one student will achieve, so we won't claim it. What we can promise is clarity: a clear, specific view of where the marks went, and a specific way to pick them back up — for the students who need that most.

See if it feels different

The best way to judge whether this is built for your kind of student is to look at it. Our sample Drill Pack is a real example: the method named on each question, the steps revealed one at a time, the mark scheme right there. No sign-up to look.

If it feels like something the student in your life would actually use — the one who finds this hard — then join the waitlist.

Try the sample Drill Pack → · Join the waitlist →

Gradora launches in autumn 2026. Join the waitlist for early access and a free first month of Pro.

— The founder, Gradora